what's webhard? file down site  Compared to the following clouds, media playback in mobile environments is advantageous. Especially regarding videos, the next cloud has to be downloaded as a whole, while streaming. Merely to stream! I need to install another app again. Cloud alone is not enough to stream.    Faster compared to the next cloud. About 20%.    Once you open a document with a cloud viewer, it breaks less than the next cloud (but breaking itself is already a problem).    Web app is supported. It's rudimentary, but it is possible to write. However, the problem is that the document format is a bizarre format, such as .ndoc, which makes it extremely incompatible.    File sharing through the URL (but that is as far as the next cloud is concerned).    Webhard     It includes a smaller capacity compared to the next cloud.    Compared to foreign cloud services, it boasts poor service quality.    Compared to the next cloud, it is extremely disadvantageous for music playback. Continuous streaming is possible only for several selected sound sources. Another cloud only needs to be in a folder.    You must share a URL which means you can't share music files or videos.    According to the report, there exists a saying that N drive looks like an area drive when installed, but only it comes out like a local drive, that is no not the same as the folder synchronization setting. It's a whole lot worse for computers to begin with when external programs play tricks in it. It's much better to just clean up the synchronization folder.***    It is very specialized in playing music. In particular, it is the only cloud that may play sound sources within an environment much like MP3 players we are acquainted with. Although each song has some buffering, it seems to play up to 192kpbs continuously, assuming that communication is in good condition in a 3G environment. Needless to say, in reality, it's often take off at that point)    It has a large capacity. It is just a significant advantage when contemplating domestic cloud services all together, which have poor quality of media access in cloud services.    You can substitute the end drive above. In particular, if a picture is within a document, it really is rarely opened properly.    Streaming songs often cuts off (but not often) due to communication issues with the cloud, not Internet speed problems. Personally i think like it's about once every two hours. And if you listen to high-quality sound sources, it gets buffered often, or if you're in a place where in fact the 3G environment isn't smooth, it gets take off more often. So when it's in that state, you have to find the path of the folder where the song was playing and play it again.    The only way to share is folder sharing. Only some documents or presentation files are for sale to file viewing. Except for those points, you'll find nothing to say even if it really is almost a webhard level.    Foreign Cloud Comparison (Google Drive, Dropbox, Box, Skydrive)    Google Drive    It exerts tremendous power in writing documents. In particular, even lacking any office program, Google Drive can cover it somewhat. 웹하드 순위 Not fancy ppts or fancy excels, nearly every simple document is OK.    It is beneficial to reflect the progress of work in the mobile environment. By establishing only offline views, the files you focus on can continue to be reflected in the cloud instantly. This can be a very convenient feature for sharing files with other users.    It is easy to connect to other Google services such as for example Gmail.    Unless you upload documents right to the Google drive but write them on the Google drive web app, the capability of the file does not take into account cloud storage (what do you mean, if you just use the web app, the capability of the Google drive is infinite).    Now, photo media access is strong at the dropbox level. It is possible to flip through photos and videos can be played right away. However, the loading time appears to take a little longer compared to the dropbox. I feel it), nonetheless it doesn't bother me.    There are probably the most apps that could be connected. In a desktop environment. Various connection apps allow various operations in the net environment without installing programs on the computer. It's a tiny problem that the app doesn't connect at all on mobile, but it is the best in the desktop environment.    Upload a small pdf file and change it to Google Docs format. It could then be stored again in MS Word format or something. However, it really is only possible with pdf files of 2MB or less.    There is no bandwidth restriction in name. There is a testimony that it is a block after a lot of writing, but it isn't stipulated by company policy.    If you are using Google Docs web app, it is possible to save documents indefinitely, but if you save them indefinitely, it's the same as once you lose your Internet connection, you are going to sink and work with MS word, right?)    Google Docs web app, cloud-connected web app, support for editing files utilizing a variety of programs, nonetheless it is still crude in comparison to office programs used on computers.Could it be obvious?)      Dropbox    It exerts its strongest power in media viewing. Photo folders? Can be flipped smoothly (Domestic cloud services require a specific amount of buffering time for each photo). However, if you wait a bit for the dropbox, the photos in a single folder are loaded entirely. While looking at Photo A, Photo B is loaded and scrolling can be done without any blockage. Video? Beyond streaming, you can freely specify before start of playback. It's the best in the world when it comes to media reading.    There are various method of increasing capacity. Camera upload settings, invitation of friends, events at the business level, etc.        The speed is relatively good. It's a lot faster than the Box and doesn't bother with Google Drive.    The file capacity limit which might be uploaded from the free account is the largest. 300MB.    The bandwidth of the free account is larger than that of the Box. It is updated by 20GB per day. It's practically infinite unless you are going to share large files.    The starting capacity is the smallest. Two gigabytes of dirt.    Price compared to capacity is the most expensive cloud service. Dirty bastards...    There is a saying that changes in documents can't be reflected in real time when working on documents.    Word documents shouldn't flip different files like picture documents.    The dropbox itself cannot be documented.    There are the most compatible apps in the mobile environment. If you want to work on a document, it is possible to choose the interface you need through the app drive and focus on it leisurely.     In the case of document files, simple document inquiry is really a convenient axis because previews are given. Unlike additional.dropboxes, if there are multiple Word documents in a folder, Word documents can even be flipped over the file or file, as is seen in the photo file.    File sharing support is fairly good. This box allows anyone who manages or creates a website to talk about data conveniently with little use of the net page's resources. However, the bandwidth of the free account is 10GB per month, which is quite small.    Slow. Not paid people.     Media access is quite disadvantageous. It's a whole lot worse than Google Drive, which says it's disadvantageous above. It's better to just do it on a computer than listen to it for a test.    The uploadable file capacity limit is the smallest. 100MB. Free account only.    In a mobile environment, real-time documentation is rarely supported.    Unless you install Boxeditor, the documentation will be written with an extension that may only be written on Box (it works, so it is better than Dropbox, but it's less than Google Drive).    It was recently updated (on 22 February?). Media access is currently quite convenient. Especially photo files. But the pace is still a little slow.***    Skydrive    The writing function is very powerful. Many cloud services offer Web apps. But Skydrive's may be the most similar to the MS office documenting environment we've often used. And there's also the most supported handwriting, though it is four-legged.    The basic capacity is quite good. 7GB. Well, it isn't that strong a difference.    It is no exaggeration to state that the interface of mobile apps is the most backward cloud service ever.

Forum Role: Participant

Topics Started: 0

Replies Created: 0